nanog mailing list archives

Re: On another security note... (of sorts)


From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 03:49:45 -0400 (EDT)

On Thu, 15 Jul 2010, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:46:24 EDT, "J. Oquendo" said:
RFP anyone.. Botnet Mitigation for Networks surely collectively it would
and CAN work.

A nice idea, but consider if a more automated tool/system was created to
behead a botnet (50,000 null0 routes to blackhole all the nodes? Or accept
collateral damage? etc).  Now consider that jujutsu is designed around using
the opponent's energy against him.

How can this possibly go wrong? :)


Damned if they do, Damned if they don't.

It seems like every 4-6 weeks people alternate between ISPs are bad because they don't try to prevent X, Y or Z; and then 4-6 weeks later
ISPs are bad because they tried to prevent A, B or C.  It doesn't matter
what A, B, C or X, Y, Z are; it must be the ISPs fault.

Everyone agrees that ISPs are bad, they just disagree about what ISPs
are supposed to do about whatever.

And so it goes...


Current thread: