nanog mailing list archives

Re: Vyatta as a BRAS


From: Florian Weimer <fweimer () bfk de>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:59:39 +0000

* Roland Dobbins:

On Jul 14, 2010, at 8:38 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:

There's also the question of IP options (or extension headers). 8-)

I know that some modern hardware-based routers have the ability to
either ignore options, or to drop option packets altogether.

There might be contractual reasons not to enable that feature. 8-/
Some vendors can process options in hardware, though.

I believe the same is now true of IPv6 extension-headere, or soon
will be.  You're absolutely correct that this is a significant
possible attack vector, causing the packets in question to be
punted, if there isn't a mechanism available to ignore them or to
drop said packets.

It's probably not a high-priority issue for vendors until there are
network issues (as opposed to potential problems seen in labs), so
it's going to take quite a bit of time.  Demand for devices with some
IP-layer inspection capability that can handle (Fast or Gigabit)
Ethernet at line rate, no matter what type of frames come in, is also
a pretty recent thing, and I would be surprised if vendors can provide
such capabilities across their entire relevant product line (where
they advertise line-based forwarding).

-- 
Florian Weimer                <fweimer () bfk de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH       http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100              tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe             fax: +49-721-96201-99


Current thread: