nanog mailing list archives
Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links
From: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon () cox net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:52:02 -0600
On 1/27/2010 5:09 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Jan 27, 2010, at 2:38 AM, Randy Bush wrote:The general intent of the /48 allocation is that it is large enough for nearly everybody, with nearly everybody including all but the largest of organisations.the general intent of a class B allocation is that it is large enough for nearly everybody, with nearly everybody including all but the largest of organisations. hmmmmm randyThat would, indeed, work if we weren't short of class B networks to assign. Owen
ITYM --- That would, indeed, work if we weren't so short sighted in our view of how the demand economics term) would expand to exceed the supply.
[For the record I do not see any way of foreseeing the unforeseen (and unforeseeable). I ask only that the latest whizbang be marketed as the latest whizbang (which is likely to be be pretty impressive--it always has been), not the answer for all of time.)
--"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have."
Remember: The Ark was built by amateurs, the Titanic by professionals. Requiescas in pace o email Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Eppure si rinfrescaICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
Current thread:
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links, (continued)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mark Smith (Jan 26)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mark Andrews (Jan 26)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Randy Bush (Jan 27)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Owen DeLong (Jan 27)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mark Smith (Jan 27)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mark Smith (Jan 27)
- Message not available
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Randy Bush (Jan 27)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mark Andrews (Jan 27)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mark Smith (Jan 27)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Nathan Ward (Jan 27)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Larry Sheldon (Jan 27)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Owen DeLong (Jan 25)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Tim Durack (Jan 25)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Christopher Morrow (Jan 25)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Tim Durack (Jan 26)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Seth Mattinen (Jan 26)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Christopher Morrow (Jan 26)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Owen DeLong (Jan 26)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Christopher Morrow (Jan 25)
- RE: Using /126 for IPv6 router links TJ (Jan 26)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Nick Hilliard (Jan 26)