nanog mailing list archives

Re: Spamhaus


From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 07:50:22 +0530

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Joel M Snyder <Joel.Snyder () opus1 com> wrote:
but the false positive count jumped by 112 messages per 10,000 (because
APEWS was somehow having a lousy month).

In general, the more reputation services you include, the more likely it is
you're going to have false positives.

Christ.  You pick APEWS as a reputation filter.. and then even bother
to *count* the false positives?

That's not a list that's particularly designed to minimize FPs, to put
it very mildly.

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)


Current thread: