nanog mailing list archives

Re: dns interceptors


From: Steven Bellovin <smb () cs columbia edu>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:59:56 -0500


On Feb 14, 2010, at 6:54 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:


In message <alpine.GSO.2.00.1002141746410.9929 () clifden donelan com>, Sean Donel
an writes:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Randy Bush wrote:
ssh tunnels to IP address
i am often on funky networks in funky places.  e.g. the wireless in
changi really sucked friday night.  if i ssh tunneled, it would multiply
the suckiness as tcp would have puked at the loss rate.
smb whacked me that i should use non-tcp tunnels.

Their network, their rules; your network, your rules; my network, my 
rules.

There is also "truth in advertising" laws.  If they advertise
"Internet" access then you should get the "Internet" not a cut down /
filtered version.

Yes -- and as a reward for your expertise, you get to explain the problem with a transparent DNS proxy to the judge.  
For bonus points, explain it to a jury....

                --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb







Current thread: