nanog mailing list archives
Re: Mitigating human error in the SP
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 08:53:44 +0530
I'll say "as vijay gill notes" after Stefan posted those two very interesting links. He's saying much the same that I did - in a great deal more detail. Fascinating.
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog44/presentations/Monday/Gill_programatic_N44.pdf His Blog article on "Infrastructure is Software" further expounds upon the benefits of such an approach - http://vijaygill.wordpress.com/2009/07/22/infrastructure-is-software/
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Dave CROCKER <dhc2 () dcrocker net> wrote:
Otherwise, as Suresh notes, the only way to eliminate human error completely is to eliminate the presence of humans in the activity.
-- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- RE: Mitigating human error in the SP, (continued)
- RE: Mitigating human error in the SP Stefan Fouant (Feb 01)
- Re: Mitigating human error in the SP Ross Vandegrift (Feb 03)
- Re: Mitigating human error in the SP Christopher Morrow (Feb 03)
- Re: Mitigating human error in the SP Michael Dillon (Feb 03)
- Re: Mitigating human error in the SP David Hiers (Feb 03)
- RE: Mitigating human error in the SP Stefan Fouant (Feb 01)
- Re: Mitigating human error in the SP Michael Dillon (Feb 02)
- Re: Mitigating human error in the SP Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 02)
- Re: Mitigating human error in the SP Steven Bellovin (Feb 02)
- Re: Mitigating human error in the SP Brian Raaen (Feb 03)
- Re: Mitigating human error in the SP Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 01)
- Re: Mitigating human error in the SP Paul Corrao (Feb 02)
- Re: Mitigating human error in the SP Chadwick Sorrell (Feb 02)
- Re: Mitigating human error in the SP Michael Dillon (Feb 02)
- Re: Mitigating human error in the SP David Hiers (Feb 02)
- Re: Mitigating human error in the SP James Downs (Feb 02)