nanog mailing list archives
Re: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]
From: Michael Dillon <wavetossed () googlemail com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:47:13 +0000
For those of you that are unaware, it is possible to contact the State Department to get involved with ITU activities and be added to their mailing lists to discuss these positions.
In addition, if you work for a largish company, they probably have a regulatory department which may already have someone involved in ITU standardisation activities, or already involved with the State Department, or involved with the FCC. So it would be a good idea to hunt around internally (contact legal and ask them if they know of anyone dealing with regulatory issues) and then liaise with that person. In particular, if your employer is a telco, it is unlikely that the regulatory liaison knows anything about the self-regulatory RIR system, and maybe some education is in order. I believe the ITU intends to set themselves up as an alternative to the RIRs with a large IANA allocation, if they can get it. --Michael Dillon
Current thread:
- [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group] Adam Waite (Feb 26)
- RE: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group] Brandon Kim (Feb 26)
- Re: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group] Jared Mauch (Feb 26)
- Re: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group] Marshall Eubanks (Feb 26)
- Re: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group] Tom Vest (Feb 26)
- Re: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group] Marshall Eubanks (Feb 26)
- Re: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group] Jared Mauch (Feb 26)
- Re: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group] Michael Dillon (Feb 26)
- RE: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group] Skeeve Stevens (Feb 26)
- RE: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group] Brandon Kim (Feb 26)
- Re: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group] gordon b slater (Feb 26)
- Re: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group] Kevin Oberman (Feb 26)
- Re: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group] gordon b slater (Feb 26)
- Re: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group] David Conrad (Feb 26)
- Re: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group] Antonio Querubin (Feb 26)
- Re: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group] Nick Hilliard (Feb 26)
- Re: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group] David Conrad (Feb 26)