nanog mailing list archives

Re: Net-Neutrality or Net-Neutered?


From: Beavis <pfunix () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:01:19 -0600

we'll if ICANN't .. maybe HECANN (*trying out humor*).

this idea of second internet doesn't make sense.
icann alone is already a handful.

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Ken <ken () sizone org> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:20:17PM -0600, Beavis said:
 >I come across this interesting link.
 >
 >http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4828&tag=nl.e036
 >
 >Is ICANN really that susceptible to govt. pressure?

Funny, tho - being succeptible to govt pressure CREATES an alt root DNS
structure. You'd think the smart thinkers in the govt woulda figured
that out. Apply pressure and it splinters. Sometimes easier to supervise
if its in one pile, no?

Also, "new DNS = whole new internet"? lol.

/kc
--
Ken Chase - ken () heavycomputing ca - +1 416 897 6284 - Toronto CANADA
Heavy Computing - Clued bandwidth, colocation and managed linux VPS @151 Front St. W.





-- 
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments

Disclaimer:
http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/


Current thread: