nanog mailing list archives
Re: LOIC tool used in the "Anonymous" attacks
From: mikea <mikea () mikea ath cx>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 08:49:03 -0600
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:59:07AM -0800, andrew.wallace wrote:
I was reading about this- yeah really "anonymous". http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/12/anonymous-releases-very-unanonymous-press-release/ Also: http://www.boingboing.net/2010/12/11/anonymous-isnt-loic.html
All we know with certainty is that there is *a* name in the metadata. Why would anyone conclude that it is definitely the name of the author? -- Mike Andrews, W5EGO mikea () mikea ath cx Tired old sysadmin
Current thread:
- LOIC tool used in the "Anonymous" attacks Marshall Eubanks (Dec 11)
- Re: LOIC tool used in the "Anonymous" attacks Beavis (Dec 11)
- RE: LOIC tool used in the "Anonymous" attacks Stefan Fouant (Dec 11)
- Re: LOIC tool used in the "Anonymous" attacks John Adams (Dec 11)
- Re: LOIC tool used in the "Anonymous" attacks Leo Bicknell (Dec 11)
- Re: LOIC tool used in the "Anonymous" attacks Marshall Eubanks (Dec 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: LOIC tool used in the "Anonymous" attacks andrew.wallace (Dec 11)
- Re: LOIC tool used in the "Anonymous" attacks mikea (Dec 13)
- Re: LOIC tool used in the "Anonymous" attacks andrew.wallace (Dec 11)