nanog mailing list archives
Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions
From: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 09:04:47 -0500
On 12/1/10 8:47 PM, William Herrin wrote:
"Dual agency is not legal in all 50 states." Kinda the opposite of the monopoly/duopoly ISP who doesn't seek your permission in dealing with anyone else. Finally, realize that in both cases (real estate agent and apartment broker) you're dealing with a competitive negotiated process. The law allows -many- things in negotiated contracts that are flat illegal in the contracts of adhesion typically offered to the residential Internet buyer.
I was going to reply to Derek, but William beat me to it. Excellent post.
Current thread:
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast'sActions Derek J. Balling (Dec 01)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast'sActions Jared Mauch (Dec 01)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast'sActions Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 01)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast'sActions William Herrin (Dec 01)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions William Allen Simpson (Dec 02)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast'sActions Steve Gibbard (Dec 02)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast'sActions William Herrin (Dec 02)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast'sActions William Herrin (Dec 03)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast'sActions Jared Mauch (Dec 01)