nanog mailing list archives
Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 14:28:16 -0500
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:10:46 +0100, Mohacsi Janos said:
Do you think adopting LISP or similar architectures to reduce the problems mentioned above?
You're better off taking the mindset that it's time to stick a fork in IPv4, it's done. Focus your attention on getting LISP or similar adopted for IPv6 before *that* routing table explodes.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes?, (continued)
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Cameron Byrne (Dec 08)
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Seth Mattinen (Dec 08)
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Cameron Byrne (Dec 08)
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Brielle Bruns (Dec 08)
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Dec 08)
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Owen DeLong (Dec 08)
- RE: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? George Bonser (Dec 08)
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Owen DeLong (Dec 08)
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 08)
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Dobbins, Roland (Dec 08)
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Cameron Byrne (Dec 08)
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Dobbins, Roland (Dec 08)
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Cameron Byrne (Dec 08)
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? David Conrad (Dec 08)
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Jack Bates (Dec 08)
- Re: Start accepting longer prefixes as IPv4 depletes? Kevin Oberman (Dec 08)