Re: Pointer for documentation on actually delivering IPv6

[Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>]

On 12/7/10 5:18 AM, david raistrick wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> > Seriously, though, you're welcome to use fd00::/8 for exactly that
> > purpose. The problem is that you (and hopefully it stays this way)
> > won't have much luck finding a vendor that will provide the NAT for
> > you to do it with.
>
> [with my flame-retardant hat installed firmly]
>
> So what's the IPV6 solution for PCI compliance, where 1.3.8 requires the
> use of RFC1918 space?  Admitedly, it's been a year or two since I last
> had to engineer around that particular set of rules...but it's life or
> death for a lot of folks.

Document a compensating control...

That particular case is trivial to demonstrate that the in scope
addresses are not exposed to the internet.

> -- 
> david raistrick        http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
> drais () icantclick org             http://www.expita.com/nomime.html