nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cloud proof of failure - was:: wikileaks unreachable
From: Simon Waters <simonw () zynet net>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 09:57:14 +0000
On Monday 06 December 2010 09:47:43 Jay Mitchell wrote:
"The Cloud" went down? I think not.
It did for at least one customer.
Having ones account terminated as opposed to an outage caused by DDoS are two very different things.
Although not for all DNS providers. There are operational lessons here. But do they boil down to technical issues may not be the limiting factor on your uptime. As commented already by someone, perhaps time to review plans for responses to non-technical threats to availability.
Current thread:
- Re: wikileaks unreachable, (continued)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Christopher Morrow (Dec 03)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Jorge Amodio (Dec 03)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable // ravi (Dec 03)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Zaid Ali (Dec 03)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Jorge Amodio (Dec 03)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Eric Brunner-Williams (Dec 03)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Christopher Morrow (Dec 03)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Eric Brunner-Williams (Dec 03)
- Cloud proof of failure - was:: wikileaks unreachable Peter Dambier (Dec 06)
- RE: Cloud proof of failure - was:: wikileaks unreachable Jay Mitchell (Dec 06)
- Re: Cloud proof of failure - was:: wikileaks unreachable Simon Waters (Dec 06)
- RE: Cloud proof of failure - was:: wikileaks unreachable Nathan Eisenberg (Dec 06)
- Re: Cloud proof of failure - was:: wikileaks unreachable Joe Greco (Dec 06)
- Re: Cloud proof of failure - was:: wikileaks unreachable Marshall Eubanks (Dec 06)
- RE: Cloud proof of failure - was:: wikileaks unreachable Nathan Eisenberg (Dec 06)
- Re: Cloud proof of failure - was:: wikileaks unreachable Jack Bates (Dec 06)
- Re: Cloud proof of failure - was:: wikileaks unreachable Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 06)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Marshall Eubanks (Dec 02)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Randy Bush (Dec 02)