Re: Pointer for documentation on actually delivering IPv6

["Miquel van Smoorenburg" <mikevs () xs4all net>]

In article <xs4all.AANLkTin5aOQKLbiXfN9ELNpoDLBCDxn1E0ATi7wbU_XA () mail gmail com> you write:
> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 19:52, Ben Jencks <ben () bjencks net> wrote:
> > DHCPv6-PD (prefix delegation) with the relay installing static routes
> > is probably the most straightforward way.
>
> Apparently that has it's own problems right now actually:
> http://blog.ioshints.info/2010/10/dhcpv6-relaying-another-trouble-spot.html

Well, the problem described there is exactly the same problem that
already exists with plain IPv4 DHCP (a pity that FORCERENEW (rfc3203)
or something like it never took off).

If you use PPPoA/PPPoE/PPPoX with DHCPv6 PD, the problem described there
doesn't exist if your CPE is at least halfway intelligent .. it should
ofcourse do a new lease request (at least a renewal) after a PPP reconnect.

Mike.