nanog mailing list archives
Re: regional ASN's
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:43:48 -0600
On 12/1/2010 3:37 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Or just have disparate networks using the same ASN. Works fine. Why waste ASNs and try to explain to others how asX,Y,Z, etc., are all the same company?
I dislike the problem of routes not being accepted with my ASN in it. There's workarounds, but they are all ugly.
Jack
Current thread:
- regional ASN's Ryan Finnesey (Dec 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: regional ASN's deleskie (Dec 01)
- Re: regional ASN's Michael Hallgren (Dec 01)
- Re: regional ASN's Patrick W. Gilmore (Dec 01)
- Re: regional ASN's Jack Bates (Dec 01)
- Re: regional ASN's Patrick W. Gilmore (Dec 01)
- Re: regional ASN's Jack Bates (Dec 01)
- Re: regional ASN's Patrick W. Gilmore (Dec 01)
- Re: regional ASN's Michael Hallgren (Dec 01)