nanog mailing list archives

Re: Trying to Make Sense of the Comcast/Level 3 Dispute


From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:43:06 -0500

On Dec 3, 2010, at 1:34 PM, christian koch wrote:

my guess is the info for that was pulled off comcast's route server, where
only tata is seen

Asymmetric routing on the Internet?  What will they think of next?!

That said, does changing the name of the middle network change the substance of the post?

-- 
TTFN,
patrick

P.S. And does Y! have a route-server to figure this stuff out? :)


On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Matthew Petach <mpetach () netflight com>wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org> wrote:
In a message written on Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 09:40:01PM -0800, Paul
Ferguson wrote:
Interesting article:


http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/blog/sjs/trying-make-sense-comcast-level-3
- -dispute

Here's an excellent summary, complete with some pictures:


http://www.voxel.net/blog/2010/12/peering-disputes-comcast-level-3-and-you

--
     Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org - CCIE 3440
      PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/



Unfortunately, they got at least part of the diagram wrong;
Yahoo uses Global Crossing to reach Comcast, not TATA.

Matt






Current thread: