nanog mailing list archives

Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions


From: Joe Provo <nanog-post () rsuc gweep net>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 07:38:34 -0500

On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 05:49:53PM -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Matthew Petach <mpetach () netflight com> wrote:

fair game for reverse billing. ?If it does, it's going to completely
eliminate "transit" as a commercial offering; instead, we'll
all be stuck doing settlements in every direction for
traffic...and that's just *way* too much paperwork. ?^_^;

oh! that's the LD network.. that worked out so darned well, can we do
it again? and can we have the ITU manage it for us? please? please?
please? :)

Obviously, that's what (3) and GLBX want back.  Perhps they are feeling
nostalgic.

-- 
             RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE


Current thread: