nanog mailing list archives

Re: Some truth about Comcast - WikiLeaks style


From: Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:53:32 -0500 (EST)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Leo Bicknell" <bicknell () ufp org>

After looking at many models I think Australia might be on to
something. The model is that a quasi-government monopoly provides
the last mile physical wire, but is unable to sell services on it.
Basically they only provide UNE's. Then, at the switching center
any ISP can pick up those UNE's and provide services. Competition
to the end user, while the last mile is always a single povider
limiting the issues above. Many cities are trying the same with
electric service, one companie provides the transport infrastructure
and when you select a generation provider.

That's what I've been advocating, what Verizon *really* *REALLY* doesn't 
want to happen (to the point that they've been agitating -- successfully
in some cases -- for state laws to forbid it), and what I think, based on
not a lot of evidence, Google is quietly encouraging with their Big Secret
Project.

Last mile fiber *really is* a Natural Monopoly.

And yeah, that's roughly how power competition was handled as well.

Cheers,
-- jra


Current thread: