nanog mailing list archives

Re: Some truth about Comcast - WikiLeaks style


From: Tim Franklin <tim () pelican org>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:28:50 +0000 (GMT)


----- "Owen DeLong" <owen () delong com> wrote:

Yeah... I'd rather see it done in such a way that there is a
prohibition of common ownership or management. Essentially,
require that the stock be split and each current owner receives
one share in each company with any shareholders who own more than 3%
of the companies having 180 days to divest from one company or the
other, or, reduce their total investment in both below 3% with a
requirement that the infrastructure provider not retain any portion
of the name of the original company and no relationship other than
supplier to the service provider company.

Obviously, this probably won't happen. The Telcos in the US have far
too powerful a lobbying force, but, I think that would be the best
thing for the consumers.

Presumably for both the consumers *and* every company involved in network services who doesn't have the luck of a 
historical last-mile monopoly.

Regards,
Tim.


Current thread: