nanog mailing list archives

Re: Did your BGP crash today?


From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen () unfix org>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 21:17:40 +0200

On 2010-08-27 21:13, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 01:29:15PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:

Unknown BGP attribute 99 (flags: 240)
Unknown BGP attribute 99 (flags: 240)
Unknown BGP attribute 99 (flags: 240)
Unknown BGP attribute 99 (flags: 240)
Unknown BGP attribute 99 (flags: 240)

Just out of curiosity, at what point will we as operators rise up 
against the ivory tower protocol designers at the IETF and demand that 
they add a mechanism to not bring down the entire BGP session because of 
a single malformed attribute? Did I miss the memo about the meeting? 
I'll bring the punch and pie.

Complain to your vendor, especially C & J are having good enough
influence on the IETF to make such a change possible.


I can agree with tearing the session down when one encounters an
improperly formatted message, but an unknown attribute, while the rest
of the format of message is fine, is a silly thing to hang up on indeed.

Greets,
 Jeroen



Current thread: