nanog mailing list archives
Re: Monitoring Tools
From: Curtis Maurand <cmaurand () xyonet com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:36:13 -0400
On 8/19/2010 4:23 PM, Phil Regnauld wrote:
<hat employer=other> While developing our own monitoring product, we've had to deal with various constraints from the customer side, for instance pharmaceutical companies where there was no way installing an agent on PLC machines would pass internal audit, without having the entire system re-validated (we're talking FDA-validated medication production here). </hat> But often, SNMPD ships with or is available as an optional base component (Windows, most UNIXes) and it's easier to convince the IT suits. Go figure. Oh, and it avoided us having to install an agent on 1000+ servers :)
But the configuration learning curve for SNMP is very steep indeed. --Curtis
Current thread:
- Re: Monitoring Tools, (continued)
- Re: Monitoring Tools Roy (Aug 19)
- RE: Monitoring Tools George Bonser (Aug 19)
- Re: Monitoring Tools Carlos Vicente (Aug 19)
- Re: Monitoring Tools Paolo Lucente (Aug 19)
- RE: Monitoring Tools Justin Horstman (Aug 19)
- Re: Monitoring Tools Warren Kumari (Aug 19)
- RE: Monitoring Tools Nathan Eisenberg (Aug 19)
- RE: Monitoring Tools Scott Berkman (Aug 19)
- RE: Monitoring Tools Nathan Eisenberg (Aug 19)
- Re: Monitoring Tools Phil Regnauld (Aug 19)
- Re: Monitoring Tools Curtis Maurand (Aug 19)
- Re: Monitoring Tools Phil Regnauld (Aug 19)
- RE: Monitoring Tools Scott Berkman (Aug 19)
- Re: RE: Monitoring Tools Michael Osburn (Aug 19)
- RE: Monitoring Tools Scott Berkman (Aug 19)
- Re: Monitoring Tools Carlos M. Martinez (Aug 19)
- Re: Monitoring Tools Mike Gatti (Aug 19)