nanog mailing list archives

Re: Recommended 1Gb SFP for ~115km?


From: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner () cluebyfour org>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 07:45:37 -0400 (EDT)

On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Abello, Vinny wrote:

Any pointers on real world experience on this topic would greatly be
appreciated. What are people using successfully out there as far as third
party SFP's go to hit a distance of approximately 115km? This would be for a
Catalyst 6506. Cisco's solution was a much more costly EDFA solution, but I
see plenty of vendors that make SFP's for Gigabit Ethernet that range from
115km to 150km and more. I know these are not supported by Cisco and TAC
won't troubleshoot if they are in the switch. I'm willing to work around
that should I need TAC assistance on the switch. What works well for a
single wavelength solution at this distance without having to switch to
DWDM? This circuit will have duplex fibers.

I just lit a ~110km fiber span with gigabit gear in the last few weeks, and I ended up going with an external line driver because the native Cisco options wouldn't work, for a variety of reasons. I would have preferred to plug directly into the 6509s I have at each end, but it wasn't feasible.

I ended up going with gear from Transition Networks. Pricing was pretty reasonable and their customer service has been great so far. There are some things with the management interface that I'm not too crazy about, but nothing that was a show-stopper. The driver has a 2-port SFP module that takes the LX12 long-haul signal in one side we drop it out the other side as 1000baseSX to drop into the 6509s. Works like a charm.

I also looked at kit from MRV and Metrobility. The MRV stuff looked good too.

Having said all that, you need to take into account the engineering characteristics of the fiber span, to make sure you choose gear that will live within the attenuation and dispersion limits that physics, fiber quality, splice quality, etc will impose upon you.

On the 110km span I just lit, I used the G.652 spec as a guide and figured for 0.2 dB/km of attenuation at 1550 nm and 0.5 dB of loss for each connector, which got me an estimated loss budget of about 23 db, and the span tested out better than that. With an additional cross-connect at the one end I'm still at about 22.5 dB end to end. The LX12 optics I used from Transition have a link budget of 32 dB, so we have a bit of headroom.

jms


Current thread: