nanog mailing list archives

Re: ARIN IP6 policy for those with legacy IP4 Space


From: Martin Barry <marty () supine com>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:39:19 +0200

$quoted_author = "Joe Greco" ;

Perhaps the true issue is that what you see as broken is perceived as "working
as intended" by much of the community and membership?

That's a great point.  Would you agree, then, that much of the community
and membership implicitly sees little value in IPv6?  

Is that orthogonal to Owen's statement?

 
You can claim that's a bit of a stretch, but quite frankly, the RIR
policies, the sketchy support by providers, the lack of v6 support in
much common gear, and so many other things seem to be all conspiring
against v6 adoption.  I need only point to v6 adoption rates to support
that statement.

Which rates would those be?

http://www.ipv6actnow.org/info/statistics/

IPv6 has had a slow start but it's certainly picking up.

cheers
Marty 


Current thread: