nanog mailing list archives

RE: Books for the NOC guys...


From: "Scott Berkman" <scott () sberkman net>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 09:50:38 -0400

I just show them this:

http://warriorsofthe.net/

        -Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Sheldon [mailto:LarrySheldon () cox net] 
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 9:46 AM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: Books for the NOC guys...

On 4/2/2010 08:39, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 13:48:48 BST, Michael Dillon said:
So, what are you having your up-and-coming NOC staff read?

In an attempt to wean them off of unmanageable PERL scripts

There is not, and there never will be, a useful programming language that
makes it the least bit difficult to write totally abominable
creeping-horror
unmaintainable code in.

The ability of a programmer to write totally obtuse code is entirely
orthogonal to the choice of implementation language.  Some people just
don't
have good taste, and will produce train wrecks in any language. Remember
that
it's possible to write Fortran-IV code in any language. :)

Unless you teach them stuff like "Document the sources and expected types
of
input data", "add useful comments that explain your choice of algorithms
rather
than  "a++; /* Add one to A */", and "If the language supports operator
overloading, don't be a bozo and abuse it", the code will be
unmaintainable.

"Teach them".  Train them.  Have standards.  Enforce them (pay according
to compliance).

What a concept!  We did that using Autocoder and COBOL.

What next?  "Manage" them?  Is that even legal?
-- 
Democracy: Three wolves and a sheep voting on the dinner menu.

Requiescas in pace o email
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
Eppure si rinfresca

ICBM Targeting Information:  http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml

        




Current thread: