Re: Likely /8 Scenario - Carriers will TAKE what they want ?

[Michael Dillon <wavetossed () googlemail com>]

and what makes you think that there is anyone looking after the
mailing lists any more. There have been few network operational
threads in recent months, and the Jim Fleming IPv3 bot is given free
rein on the NANOG lists. Go look at the traffic for nanaog-futures
this month. 100% of the postings are from Fleming. Soon he will be
telling us about how IPv16 is one better than IPv6 or that the average
domain name should only be four letters long.

In fact, although the postings seem loony, I think they are really an
attempt to drive traffic to his various sites in order to earn money
from Google AdSense and similar schemes.

On 8 April 2010 20:07, Jack Carrozzo <jack () crepinc com> wrote:
> Might want to save the we're-all-going-to-die for nanog-lounge or
> whatever was created and leave the more likely operational scenarios
> here.
>
> Just sayin' </kanye>
>
> -J
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:53 PM, IPv3.com <ipv3.com () gmail com> wrote:
> > Likely /8 Scenario - Carriers will TAKE what they want ?
> >
> > As /8s are needed by Carriers (not ISPs) they will likely be able to
> > just take them.
> > Who will stop them. They have the Imperial Walker Routers & Gear.
> >
> > http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ipv4-address-space.txt
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walker_%28Star_Wars%29