nanog mailing list archives
Re: what about 48 bits?
From: Vince Fuller <vaf () cisco com>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 13:02:51 -0700
To be fair, everything for a vax was somewhat pricey. And slow. On an even more unrelated note, does anyone remember the day that CMU-TEK tcp/ip stopped working some time in the early 1990s? That was a load of fun.
What made it stop working? I was the guy to blame for the IP/TCP/UDP parts of "CMU-TEK" and had long since left CMU by the mid-90s. Dale Moore (still at CMU last time I checked) did the applications. --Vince
Current thread:
- Re: what about 48 bits?, (continued)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 04)
- Re: what about 48 bits? joel jaeggli (Apr 04)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Bill Bogstad (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Jay Nakamura (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Steven Bellovin (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Jay Nakamura (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Steven Bellovin (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Nick Hilliard (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Jeroen van Aart (Apr 07)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Vince Fuller (Apr 08)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Barry Shein (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Steven Bellovin (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Bill Stewart (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Stephen Sprunk (Apr 06)
- Re: what about 48 bits? joel jaeggli (Apr 06)
- Re: what about 48 bits? John Kristoff (Apr 07)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Roland Perry (Apr 07)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Joe Greco (Apr 07)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Roland Perry (Apr 07)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Joe Greco (Apr 07)