nanog mailing list archives
Re: Finding content in your job title
From: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon () cox net>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 22:00:11 -0500
On 4/7/2010 17:45, Gregory Hicks wrote:
Actually, it doesn't matter how much you make per hour, the deciding factor between exempt and non-exempt is how many (if any) people you SUPERVISE. No supervision of others, then non-exempt.
I don't think that is correct. "Professionals" do not supervise people but if the substantial control their own activities and make above a certain level in total compensation, they may be exempt.
Now you and the employer may agree to some other definition, but that is between you and them. At my previous $DAY_JOB, a technicion who was classified as "exempt" took $EMPLOYER to court over back pay, overtime, lunch breaks, et al and WON. (He had no direct reports...)
He probably failed the compensation test, or more likely, did not control his own activities. -- Democracy: Three wolves and a sheep voting on the dinner menu. Requiescas in pace o email Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Eppure si rinfresca ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
Current thread:
- RE: Finding content in your job title, (continued)
- RE: Finding content in your job title Justin Horstman (Apr 02)
- Re: Finding content in your job title Lamar Owen (Apr 02)
- Re: Finding content in your job title Jeroen van Aart (Apr 07)
- Re: Finding content in your job title Larry Sheldon (Apr 07)
- Re: Finding content in your job title Jeroen van Aart (Apr 07)
- RE: Finding content in your job title Justin Horstman (Apr 02)
- Re: Finding content in your job title Steven Bellovin (Apr 07)
- Re: Finding content in your job title Owen DeLong (Apr 07)
- Re: Finding content in your job title Larry Sheldon (Apr 07)