nanog mailing list archives
Re: what about 48 bits?
From: Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 13:08:56 -0500
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 11:53:54AM -0300, A.B. Jr. wrote:
Hi, Lots of traffic recently about 64 bits being too short or too long. What about mac addresses? Aren't they close to exhaustion? Should be. Or it is assumed that mac addresses are being widely reused throughout the world? All those low cost switches and wifi adapters DO use unique mac addresses?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MAC_address The IEEE expects the MAC-48 space to be exhausted no sooner than the year 2100[3]; EUI-64s are not expected to run out in the foreseeable future. -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
Current thread:
- Re: what about 48 bits?, (continued)
- Re: what about 48 bits? David Andersen (Apr 04)
- Re: what about 48 bits? John Peach (Apr 04)
- Re: what about 48 bits? William Herrin (Apr 04)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Jonathan Lassoff (Apr 04)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Steven Bellovin (Apr 04)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Jim Burwell (Apr 04)
- Re: what about 48 bits? John Peach (Apr 04)
- Re: what about 48 bits? David Andersen (Apr 04)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Mark Andrews (Apr 04)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Mark Smith (Apr 04)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Matthew Kaufman (Apr 04)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Scott Howard (Apr 04)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Mark Smith (Apr 04)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 04)
- Re: what about 48 bits? joel jaeggli (Apr 04)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Bill Bogstad (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Jay Nakamura (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Steven Bellovin (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Jay Nakamura (Apr 05)
- Re: what about 48 bits? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 05)