nanog mailing list archives
Re: legacy /8
From: Zaid Ali <zaid () zaidali com>
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 14:49:57 -0700
They are not glowing because applications are simply not moving to IPv6. Google has two popular applications on IPv6, Netflix is on it way there but what are other application companies doing about it? A popular application like e-mail is so far behind [ref: http://eng.genius.com/blog/2009/09/14/email-on-ipv6/] and I still encounter registrar's providing DNS service not supporting Quad A's. I feel talking to network operators is preaching to the choir, the challenge is helping content providers think about moving to IPv6. <Sarcasm>I think we will only see success once we are able to successfully work with content providers but they are quite busy now building real technology like the "Cloud" </Sarcasm> Zaid On 4/3/10 2:22 PM, "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk () iname com> wrote:
If "every significant router on the market" supported IPv6 five years ago, why aren't transit links glowing with IPv6 connectivity? If it's not the hardware, than I'm guessing it's something else, like people or processes? Frank -----Original Message----- From: Michael Dillon [mailto:wavetossed () googlemail com] Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2010 1:07 PM To: Larry Sheldon Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: legacy /8Not often you hear something that has changed just about every aspect of life and enabled things that could not be imagined at its outset called a failureSounds like you are describing the Roman Empire. It failed and that's why we now have an EU in its place. Things change. Time to move on. IPv4 has run out of addresses and we are nowhere near finished GROWING THE NETWORK. IPv6 was created to solve just this problem, and 10 years ago folks started deploying it in order to be ready. By 5 years ago, every significant router on the market supported IPv6. Now that we actually need IPv6 in order to continue network growth, most ISPs are in the fortunate position that their network hardware already supports it well enough, so the investment required is minimized. --Michael Dillon
Current thread:
- Re: legacy /8, (continued)
- Re: legacy /8 David Conrad (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 Mark Andrews (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 Paul Vixie (Apr 12)
- Re: legacy /8 Randy Bush (Apr 12)
- Re: legacy /8 Florian Weimer (Apr 12)
- Re: legacy /8 Owen DeLong (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 Mark Andrews (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Michael Dillon (Apr 03)
- RE: legacy /8 Frank Bulk (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 David Conrad (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Zaid Ali (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Owen DeLong (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 Zaid Ali (Apr 04)
- RE: legacy /8 George Bonser (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 Randy Bush (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Michael Dillon (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 Tore Anderson (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 sthaug (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 Daniel Roesen (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 Randy Bush (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 David Conrad (Apr 04)