nanog mailing list archives
Re: legacy /8
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 13:39:08 -0400
On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 08:06:44 EDT, Jeffrey Lyon said:
For small companies the cost of moving to IPv6 is far too great, especially when we rely on certain DDoS mitigation gear that does not yet have an IPv6 equivalent.
So? How many people are *realistically* being hit by IPv6 DDoS right now? (I saw a number in the last 2-3 days that 2-3% of spam is now being delivered via SMTP-over-IPv6). You may not need that gear as much as you thought... Did you tell your mitigation gear vendor 5 years ago that their next model needed to have IPv6 support? Given that currently most stuff is dual-stack, and IPv6 isn't totally widespread, what are the effects of doing IPv6 DDoS mitigation by simply turning off IPv6 on your upstream link and letting traffic fall back to IPv4 where you have mitigation gear?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: legacy /8, (continued)
- Re: legacy /8 Lamar Owen (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Cutler James R (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Jeroen van Aart (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Andrew Gray (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Owen DeLong (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 bmanning (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Cutler James R (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Jeroen van Aart (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Jim Burwell (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Jeffrey Lyon (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Leen Besselink (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 Roland Perry (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 Zaid Ali (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 William Warren (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 Dobbins, Roland (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 Jeroen van Aart (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Owen DeLong (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 Roland Perry (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 Joe Greco (Apr 04)
- Re: legacy /8 Roland Perry (Apr 04)