nanog mailing list archives
Re: 100% want IPv6 - Was: New Linksys CPE, IPv6 ?
From: david raistrick <drais () icantclick org>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 11:13:55 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
On 03/31/2010 08:52 PM, Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:We have just (anecdotally, empirically) established earlier in this thread, that anything smaller than a mid-sized business, can't even *GET* IPv6 easily (at least in the USA); much less care about it.fwiw, that last time I was at a company that needed a prefix, we wrote up an addressing plan, applied, received an assignment, payed our money and were done. if a pool of public addresses are a resource you need to
But were you able to get transit that let you use the address space?I'm sure it's getting better, but as recently as 2 years ago it was near impossible to get for most areas (and most providers, and most colo facilities).
-- david raistrick http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html drais () icantclick org http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
Current thread:
- Re: 100% want IPv6 - Was: New Linksys CPE, IPv6 ? Joe Greco (Apr 01)
- Re: 100% want IPv6 - Was: New Linksys CPE, IPv6 ? Bill Stewart (Apr 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 100% want IPv6 - Was: New Linksys CPE, IPv6 ? Jorge Amodio (Apr 01)
- Re: 100% want IPv6 - Was: New Linksys CPE, IPv6 ? Dale Carstensen (Apr 01)
- Re: 100% want IPv6 - Was: New Linksys CPE, IPv6 ? Larry Sheldon (Apr 01)
- Re: 100% want IPv6 - Was: New Linksys CPE, IPv6 ? Larry Sheldon (Apr 01)
- Re: 100% want IPv6 - Was: New Linksys CPE, IPv6 ? david raistrick (Apr 01)
- Re: 100% want IPv6 - Was: New Linksys CPE, IPv6 ? Joel Jaeggli (Apr 01)
- Re: 100% want IPv6 - Was: New Linksys CPE, IPv6 ? Owen DeLong (Apr 01)
- Re: 100% want IPv6 - Was: New Linksys CPE, IPv6 ? Owen DeLong (Apr 01)
- Re: 100% want IPv6 - Was: New Linksys CPE, IPv6 ? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 01)