RE: [only half OT] A socio-psychological analysis of the firstinternet war (Estonia)

["Michael Smith" <msmith () internap com>]

What is/isn't a "war"?  Was US/Vietnam a war?  It wasn't declared legally...  do you take issue with using the word war 
due to the nature of the event, or is it simply a question of scale?

From what I've read so far of this paper, the incident being called "a war" isn't central to the thesis.  Search / 
replace "war" with "incident" and the discussion works fine.  Your issue with the choice of words might be significant 
on some level, but you haven't refuted any of the conclusions.



-----Original Message-----
From: andrew.wallace [mailto:andrew.wallace () rocketmail com] 
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 5:26 PM
To: nanog () nanog org; ge () linuxbox org
Subject: Re: [only half OT] A socio-psychological analysis of the firstinternet war (Estonia)

--- On Thu, 29/4/10, Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org> wrote:

> A socio-psychological analysis of the first internet war (Estonia)

There has been no cyber war yet.

Estonia was not a cyber war.

You've got it fundamentally wrong on the world stage infront of everyone.

Andrew