nanog mailing list archives
Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
From: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon () cox net>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 14:12:11 -0500
On 4/24/2010 14:07, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
The patent which bears her and George Antheil's name is by no means (and about 30 years) the earliest example of this technology.
Few patents are. I can't think of a one, but I suppose there must be one containing no prior art at all. Does a movie star of the startlingly attractive persuasion being an accomplished engineer bother you? -- Somebody should have said: A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner. Freedom under a constitutional republic is a well armed lamb contesting the vote. Requiescas in pace o email Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Eppure si rinfresca ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
Current thread:
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?, (continued)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Joe Greco (Apr 23)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? bmanning (Apr 22)
- RE: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? John Lightfoot (Apr 22)
- RE: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Matthew Huff (Apr 22)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Charles Mills (Apr 22)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Larry Sheldon (Apr 22)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Mark Smith (Apr 23)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Larry Sheldon (Apr 22)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Marshall Eubanks (Apr 22)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Joel Jaeggli (Apr 24)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Larry Sheldon (Apr 24)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Mohacsi Janos (Apr 22)
- Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough? Mark Smith (Apr 23)