Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?

[Cutler James R <james.cutler () consultant com>]

No.  You get a different set of problems, mostly administrative.


On Apr 21, 2010, at 1:53 PM, Dave Sparro wrote:

> On 4/21/2010 8:46 AM, Jim Burwell wrote:
> > Despite it doing the job it was intended to do, I've always seen NAT
> > as a bit of an ugly hack, with potential to get even uglier with LSN
> > and multi-level NAT in the future.  I personally welcome a return to a
> > NAT-less world with IPv6.  :)
> >   
>
> Don't you get all of the same problems when there is a properly restrictive SPI firewall at both ends of the 
> connection regardless of weather NAT is used as well.

James R. Cutler
james.cutler () consultant com