nanog mailing list archives
Re: Single router for P/PE functions
From: William McCall <william.mccall () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 23:07:40 -0500
Kinda depends on what you're doing exactly, but like Erik said, it certainly possible and depending on your particular needs, it might not be much of an issue at all. Can you describe your scenario a bit more? --WM On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Serge Vautour <sergevautour () yahoo ca>wrote:
Hello, I'm pretty confident that a router can be used to perform P & PE functions simultaneously. What about from a best practice perspective? Is this something that should be completely avoided? Why? We're considering doing this as a temporary workaround but we all know temporary usually lasts a long time. I'd like to know what kind of mess awaits if we let this one go. Thanks, Serge __________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the web, and bookmark your favourite sites. Download it now http://ca.toolbar.yahoo.com.
-- William McCall, CCIE #25044
Current thread:
- Single router for P/PE functions Serge Vautour (Sep 07)
- Re: Single router for P/PE functions Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 07)
- Re: Single router for P/PE functions William McCall (Sep 07)
- Re: Single router for P/PE functions Serge Vautour (Sep 07)
- Re: Single router for P/PE functions Alex H. Ryu (Sep 07)
- Re: Single router for P/PE functions Serge Vautour (Sep 07)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Single router for P/PE functions Erik Schmersal (Sep 07)
- Message not available
- Re: Single router for P/PE functions Erik Schmersal (Sep 07)
- RE: Single router for P/PE functions Uri Joskovitch (Sep 07)
- Message not available