nanog mailing list archives
Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:41:23 -0400
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com> wrote:
Christopher Morrow wrote:Spammers have a lot of variables to change in this equation, RIR's dont always have the ability to see all of the variables, nor correlate all of the changes they see :(Being a crimnal enterprise there are some tools in your kit that a legitimate business does not have. The problems becomes, how the
that was my point, yes.
raising the legitimacy bar more effectively discriminates against legitimate entities then crimnal one's. If a discriminatory measure were for example to raise the bar for new entrants that, by it's nature represents an Internet scale tragedy.
I think we are in agreement on this issue, and the above actually. -Chris
Current thread:
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation, (continued)
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 15)
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation Christopher Morrow (Sep 15)
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation bmanning (Sep 15)
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation Christopher Morrow (Sep 15)
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation bmanning (Sep 15)
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation Christopher Morrow (Sep 15)
- RE: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation Lee Howard (Sep 16)
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 15)
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation Zaid Ali (Sep 15)
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation Christopher Morrow (Sep 15)
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation Joel Jaeggli (Sep 15)
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation Christopher Morrow (Sep 15)
- Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation Brandon Lehmann (Sep 15)