nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Confederation over Route Reflector
From: Michael Hallgren <m.hallgren () free fr>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:17:36 +0200
Le jeudi 10 septembre 2009 à 11:20 -0600, Jason Iannone a écrit :
I would say confeds are more appropriate for larger ibgp networks. You can have reflectors inside confederations. See the BGP chapter of the JNCIP book.
I'd say, the choice is much dependent on the "political" topology within your AS. The more inter-regional routing policing you feel that you need, the more you'd be looking at a confed. architecture. mh
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Buraglio, Nicholas D <buraglio () illinois edu> wrote:Lots of things can be used to determine how you decide to set up your BGP peers. https://www.juniper.net/customers/csc/documentation/techdocs/downloads/pdf/350010.pdf has a decent amount of information on some of the differences that can help you decide how to set up your peerings. nb --- Nick Buraglio Network Engineer, CITES, University of Illinois GPG key 0x2E5B44F4 Phone: 217.244.6428 buraglio () illinois edu On Sep 9, 2009, at 9:52 PM, devang patel wrote:Hello, What are the advantages of BGP Confederation over Route Reflector? I mean when one should decide to deploy BGP Confederation over Route Reflector deployment? Thanks, Devang Patel
-- michael hallgren, mh2198-ripe
Current thread:
- BGP Confederation over Route Reflector devang patel (Sep 09)
- Re: BGP Confederation over Route Reflector Buraglio, Nicholas D (Sep 10)
- Re: BGP Confederation over Route Reflector Jason Iannone (Sep 10)
- Re: BGP Confederation over Route Reflector Michael Hallgren (Sep 10)
- Re: BGP Confederation over Route Reflector Jason Iannone (Sep 10)
- Re: BGP Confederation over Route Reflector Andy Davidson (Sep 19)
- Re: BGP Confederation over Route Reflector Buraglio, Nicholas D (Sep 10)