nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP port blocking practice
From: "James R. Cutler" <james.cutler () consultant com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:58:38 -0400
Blocking the well known port 25 does not block sending of mail. Or the message content.
Blocking various well know M$ protocol ports does not block remote file access. Or control the type of files that can be accessed.
I think the relevant neutrality principle is that traffic is not blocked by content.
So, no, blocking any port is NOT against the idea of Net Neutrality. On Oct 23, 2009, at 5:19 PM, Lee Riemer wrote:
Isn't blocking any port against the idea of Net Neutrality?
James R. Cutler james.cutler () consultant com
Current thread:
- Re: ISP port blocking practice, (continued)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Owen DeLong (Oct 22)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Chris Boyd (Oct 23)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Jack Bates (Oct 23)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Steve Bertrand (Oct 23)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Michael Peddemors (Oct 23)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Steve Bertrand (Oct 23)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice JC Dill (Oct 24)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Justin Shore (Oct 23)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Lee Riemer (Oct 23)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice James R. Cutler (Oct 23)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Dan White (Oct 23)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Justin Shore (Oct 23)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Dan White (Oct 23)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Owen DeLong (Oct 23)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 24)
- Re: ISP port blocking practice Clue Store (Oct 24)