nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:33:15 +0200
On 21 okt 2009, at 22:23, Chris Adams wrote:
What we need is a thing that gives us what we need to connect to the network (addresses, DNS servers) and then a pointer in the form of an HTTP or HTTPS URL for all other configuration.
You want to invent yet _another_ form of configuration management?
Short answer: no, life is too short and I have other problems that need solving.
Long answer: what we have now is a mess, if we want to clean up the mess we have to get it right, and putting new options in binary protocols is not right in any way, shape or form.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Nick Hilliard (Oct 18)
- RE: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN TJ (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Matthew Kaufman (Oct 18)
- RE: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN TJ (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Mohacsi Janos (Oct 19)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Nathan Ward (Oct 18)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN David Conrad (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Chris Adams (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Ray Soucy (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Owen DeLong (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN David Barak (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Owen DeLong (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Owen DeLong (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Karl Auer (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN bmanning (Oct 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN Karl Auer (Oct 22)