Re: 109/8 - not a BOGON

[Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda () icann org>]

On 09/10/2009 4:22, "Matthew Walster" <matthew () walster org> wrote:

> A customer of mine is reporting that there are a large number of addresses
> he can not reach with his addresses in the 109/8 range. This was
> declassified as a BOGON and assigned by IANA to RIPE in January 2009.
>
> If you have a manually updated BOGON list, can I please ask that you review
> it and update it as soon as possible please? His addresses in 89/8 and 83/8
> work just fine, hence this presumption of BOGON filtering.

This might be a good moment to list all the /8s allocated so far this year.

046/8    RIPE NCC    2009-09    whois.ripe.net     ALLOCATED
002/8    RIPE NCC    2009-09    whois.ripe.net     ALLOCATED
182/8    APNIC       2009-08    whois.apnic.net    ALLOCATED
175/8    APNIC       2009-08    whois.apnic.net    ALLOCATED
183/8    APNIC       2009-04    whois.apnic.net    ALLOCATED
180/8    APNIC       2009-04    whois.apnic.net    ALLOCATED
178/8    RIPE NCC    2009-01    whois.ripe.net     ALLOCATED
109/8    RIPE NCC    2009-01    whois.ripe.net     ALLOCATED

Also, I'd like to mention that if you ever want to check your filters
against the registry, we have made the columns sortable. It's now nice and
easy to identify newly allocated /8s.

http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ipv4-address-space.xml

Regards,

Leo Vegoda