nanog mailing list archives
Re: Practical numbers for IPv6 allocations
From: David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 18:17:23 -0700
On Oct 6, 2009, at 6:13 PM, Nathan Ward wrote:
My understanding is that the RIRs are doing sparse allocation, as opposed to reserving a few bits. I could be wrong.
Last I heard, with the exception of APNIC and contrary to what they indicated they'd do prior to IANA allocating the /12s, you are indeed wrong. I'd be happy to hear things have changed.
Regards, -drc
Current thread:
- Practical numbers for IPv6 allocations Doug Barton (Oct 05)
- Re: Practical numbers for IPv6 allocations George Michaelson (Oct 05)
- Re: Practical numbers for IPv6 allocations Christopher Morrow (Oct 05)
- Re: Practical numbers for IPv6 allocations TJ (Oct 06)
- RE: Practical numbers for IPv6 allocations Tony Hain (Oct 06)
- Re: Practical numbers for IPv6 allocations Doug Barton (Oct 06)
- Re: Practical numbers for IPv6 allocations Nathan Ward (Oct 06)
- Re: Practical numbers for IPv6 allocations David Conrad (Oct 06)
- Re: Practical numbers for IPv6 allocations David Conrad (Oct 06)
- Re: Practical numbers for IPv6 allocations Kevin Loch (Oct 07)
- Re: Practical numbers for IPv6 allocations Doug Barton (Oct 06)