nanog mailing list archives

Re: Policy News


From: Jerry Dixon <jerry () jdixon com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:57:09 -0500

While we're at it why not charge taxes for having security bolted on
too....I'm waiting for my Internet EZ-Pass to come in the mail to mount on
my cable modem :-O

I'm wondering where they come up with these schemes...I didn't see any
mention of tax breaks to encourage the roll out.  Just more charges.

Jerry

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net> wrote:

How about just mandating that it's illegal to build anything but fiber/gpon
for services.  If something fails, it needs to be replaced with modern
technology.

I know here they replaced copper cable in the middle of the winter last
year, it would have made more sense to just use the conduit they were
replacing and put fiber in.

But the fiber union guys != copper union guys so that is harder to do.

Oh well, stuck in the 70's with my ISDN.

       - Jared

On Nov 18, 2009, at 9:39 AM, Jerry Dixon wrote:

If you can make it they can tax it :/

Article in today's Wall Street Journal:

"WASHINGTON -- Federal regulators are considering whether the government
should take greater control of the Internet and ask consumers to pay
higher
phone charges in order to provide all Americans with cheaper access to
broadband Internet service.

The Federal Communications Commission Wednesday will lay out the case for
expanding broadband Internet service, outlining current obstacles to
making
it widely available. The agency is considering whether to force Internet
providers to share their networks with rivals and raise fees charged on
consumer phone bills to pay for the broader access."

Schatz, A. *Feds mull rules, fees to spur net access - WSJ.com.*
Retrieved
11/18/2009, 2009, from
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125850641299752981.html

-Jerry
--
jerry () jdixon com




-- 
jerry () jdixon com
(443) 295-3779


Current thread: