nanog mailing list archives
Re: Failover how much complexity will it add?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:46:20 -0500
On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:23:41 MST, Blake Pfankuch said:
I wouldn't sway from the big names for your primary connections either.
This is, of course, dependent on the OP's location and budget. I know when we were getting our NLR connection set up, there was a fair amount of "You want 40G worth of DWDM *where*?" involved, and the resulting topology was... complicated. At least at one time, there were places where our provider was running our link across lambdas of a subsidiary of ours, which are going across physical fiber owned by the provider... turtles all the way down. ;)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Failover how much complexity will it add? adel (Nov 08)
- RE: Failover how much complexity will it add? Blake Pfankuch (Nov 08)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Adam Rothschild (Nov 08)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 08)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Joe Maimon (Nov 08)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Seth Mattinen (Nov 08)
- RE: Failover how much complexity will it add? John.Herbert (Nov 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? adel (Nov 08)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Seth Mattinen (Nov 08)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? adel (Nov 08)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Ken Gilmour (Nov 08)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Adam Armstrong (Nov 09)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 09)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? Ken Gilmour (Nov 08)
- RE: Failover how much complexity will it add? Blake Pfankuch (Nov 08)
- Re: Failover how much complexity will it add? adel (Nov 08)