nanog mailing list archives

RE: HE.net, Fremont-2 outage?


From: Bryan King <bking () inline com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:56:32 -0600

Sry for the top post...

As more facilities are built/retrofitted with an eye toward overall efficiency using CCHP, we will start seeing more 
facilities (like Syracuse U's new datacenter) use systems like the Capstone turbines for primary power/secure 
power/CCHP. The main grid will become the backup. Not saying this approach replaces the need for batteries or some 
other storage device such as a flywheel system..


"This Year InGuard has Stopped 159,953,000 Spam E-Mails and 573,000 Viruses... Do you have 
http://www.inline.com/SolutionsbyTechnology/InternetDataCenter/InGuard/tabid/129/Default.aspx?";


InLine>
bryan king | Internet Department Director
InLine> Solutions Through Technology
600 Lakeshore Pkwy
Birmingham AL, 35209
205-278-8139 [p]
205-314-7729[f]
bking () inline com
www.InLine.com

All Quotes from InLine are only valid for 30 days. This message and any attached files may contain confidential 
information and are intended solely for the message recipient. If you are not the message recipient you are notified 
that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly 
prohibited. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, 
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept 
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. 
If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.

From: Owen DeLong [mailto:owen () delong com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 4:18 PM
To: Raphael Carrier
Cc: nanog () nanog org; Joe Greco
Subject: Re: HE.net, Fremont-2 outage?


On Nov 4, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Raphael Carrier wrote:

I know you have a rather higher faith in batteries than some of us,
but practical experience suggests that batteries are merely a mostly-
reliable technology.


Agreed batteries are unreliable, an alternative to battery based UPS
are flywheel energy storage devices, they come either as an integrated
solution with the diesel generator (i think cat offers such a package)
or as a standalone UPS (see:
www.pentadyne.com/uploads/18/File/Pentadyne-VSS-Brochure.pdf)


Apparently you do not remember 365 Main...

Batteries are reliable.
Flywheels are reliable.

Both require proper maintenance and proper procedures to handle
corner cases (like the multiple-outage corner-case that took out
365 main).

Both have their issues.

In my experience working at and with a variety of datacenters, I have
to day that I have had generally better luck with batteries than
flywheels,
but, the key difference that suggests flywheels could actually be better
technology is this:

About 50% of battery failures traced back to human factors.

100% of the flywheel failures I experienced were human factors related.

Owen

Speaking as an individual, not representing any affiliation.





Current thread: