nanog mailing list archives
Re: Local Peering and Transit - BGP multihoming
From: jamie rishaw <j () arpa com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 04:29:06 -0500
on issues like this : [1] JFGI -> if fail : [2] man smartnet -> if fail : [3] go back to studying to get that A+ and consider perhaps a yob in redmond On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn <raymond () prolocation net
wrote:
Hi! Yes, i can get sample of configuration via Google search.but i am looking for best practices and from experience people.Then post your suggested config and ask for comments....on a suitable list, dedicated to Cisco gear..Sorry, yes. :-) Plenty of Cisco lists there to answer 'questions' :-) Bye, Raymond.
-- Jamie Rishaw // .com.arpa@j <- reverse it. ish. [Impressive C-level Title Here], arpa / arpa labs
Current thread:
- Local Peering and Transit - BGP multihoming ty chan (May 21)
- Re: Local Peering and Transit - BGP multihoming Seth Mattinen (May 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Local Peering and Transit - BGP multihoming deleskie (May 21)
- Re: Local Peering and Transit - BGP multihoming ty chan (May 21)
- Re: Local Peering and Transit - BGP multihoming Raymond Dijkxhoorn (May 22)
- Re: Local Peering and Transit - BGP multihoming Mans Nilsson (May 22)
- Re: Local Peering and Transit - BGP multihoming Raymond Dijkxhoorn (May 22)
- Re: Local Peering and Transit - BGP multihoming jamie rishaw (May 22)
- Re: Local Peering and Transit - BGP multihoming ty chan (May 21)