nanog mailing list archives
Re: Temporary mail queue services?
From: "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy () druid net>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 01:50:24 -0400
On Wed, 20 May 2009 22:23:01 -0400 "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net> wrote:
Backup MX without a user list is a Bad Thing because of blowback.
And are you sure that your users are comfortable with their email being held by a third party that they don't know?
And I'll stop there before someone tells me I'm off-topic. :)
And we are. Inet Access or mailops would probably be better. -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy () druid net> | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
Current thread:
- Temporary mail queue services? Mike Lyon (May 20)
- RE: Temporary mail queue services? Tony Bunce (May 20)
- Re: Temporary mail queue services? Adam Fields (May 20)
- Re: Temporary mail queue services? Patrick W. Gilmore (May 20)
- Re: Temporary mail queue services? D'Arcy J.M. Cain (May 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Temporary mail queue services? Brielle Bruns (May 20)