nanog mailing list archives
Re: UCEProtect Level 3
From: John Peach <john-nanog () johnpeach com>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 09:56:33 -0400
On Fri, 8 May 2009 09:46:38 -0400 "Matt Liotta" <mliotta () r337 com> wrote:
On May 8, 2009, at 9:31 AM, Claus v. Wolfhausen wrote:Why do you believe people which are using Level 3 are not aware what it is doing?I am guessing the emails from uninformed victims wondering why their mail isn't getting through. Vigilantes always start out with the right intentions and then take it too far. One day you are going to filter the wrong AS.
You are blaming the wrong people. It is very clear on their website that this list should not be used for blocking. It states that there will be FPs and that you should use it as part of an overall scoring system. If you must blame someone, blame the idiots who use it to block email. -- John
Current thread:
- Re: UCEProtect Level 3, (continued)
- Re: UCEProtect Level 3 Jeffrey Meltzer (May 07)
- Re: UCEProtect Level 3 Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 07)
- Re: UCEProtect Level 3 Ken A (May 08)
- RE: UCEProtect Level 3 Skywing (May 07)
- Re: UCEProtect Level 3 Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 07)
- RE: UCEProtect Level 3 John van Oppen (May 08)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: massive snowshoe operations may be a cause for concern (was: Re:UCEProtect Level 3) Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 08)
- RE: massive snowshoe operations may be a cause for concern (was: Re:UCEProtect Level 3) John van Oppen (May 08)
- Re: UCEProtect Level 3 Matt Liotta (May 08)
- Re: UCEProtect Level 3 John Peach (May 08)
- Re: UCEProtect Level 3 Colin Alston (May 08)