[no subject]

[Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>]

Cc
Bcc: 
Subject: Re: UCEProtect Level 3
Reply-To: 
In-Reply-To: <20090507161041.f1711126.darcy () druid net>

On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 04:10:41PM -0400, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> It is.  I understand what they are trying to do but we were cut off
> from some places because someone else in the huge upstream we are with
> did something that appeared to be spam.  It's too broad of a brush.

(a) This discussion should probably be happening someplace other
than NANOG (spam-l or mailop, perhaps?), and

(b) If you feel that UCEProtect L3 paints with too broad a brush,
then you're certainly free not to use it.  I happen to agree with you
on this particular level of this particular DNSBL for my particular
applications, so I don't use it either.  However: I'm aware of other
folks who are using it quite effectively as *part* of a scoring system.

---Rsk