nanog mailing list archives

RE: REVERSE DNS Practices.


From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk () iname com>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 12:44:15 -0500

The recommendations in this draft proposal have worked for me:
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-msullivan-dnsop-generic-naming-schemes-00.txt

Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: bruce () yoafrica com [mailto:bruce () yoafrica com] 
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 5:39 AM
To: John Levine
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: REVERSE DNS Practices.

Slighty related...

Can people please post their recommended reverse dns naming conventions for a small ISP with growth and scalability in 
mind.
I already have one drawn up, but I would like to contrast and compare :D

Thanks

On 21 Mar 2009 10:32:30 -0000, John Levine <johnl () iecc com> wrote:
I want to ask some folks out there that maintain reverse DNS queries
of their respective IP blocks. I want to know if there is a need for
me to contact my upstream provider. I am in charge of 2 /24's under
LACNIC. I've already registered my DNS servers on LACNIC. but for some
weird reason it's not owning reverse resolves. any tips would be
gladly appreciated.

The RIRs don't maintain rDNS for you.  You'll have to trace the
delegations downward from in-addr.arpa, find out who's handling your
/24's, and contact them to get them to delegate your chunks to you.

R's,
John





Current thread: