nanog mailing list archives

Re: BGP nexthop-self vs. EIGRP redistribution


From: Mark Tinka <mtinka () globaltransit net>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:28:42 +0800

On Tuesday 17 March 2009 12:20:08 am phil () mindfury net 
wrote:

My question is, which is the correct method of
implementing this?  Should we be redistributing static
and connected routes on our borders into IGP, and not
using next-hop-self?  Or should we not redistribute and
use next-hop-self?

I always recommend setting the NEXT_HOP attribute to 'self' 
for all iBGP sessions at the (peering) edge, and using your 
IGP to provide reachability to all Loopback addresses in the 
network. This scales quite well.

And while IGP/BGP redistribution may be possible, we tend to 
avoid it as much as possible.

Cheers,

Mark.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Current thread: